All-In

GPT-6 Hits AGI? Tech Euphoria 2.0, SF Mansion Shortage, NYC Bans AI in Schools & Venezuela Oil Deal

Jason Calacanis, David Sacks, Chamath Palihapitiya, David Friedberg
5 Sep 2026 6 min read 1h 45m

OpenAI's GPT-6 launch has Greg Brockman declaring the AGI era has arrived, but the hosts argue the real story is a hyper-competitive market where frontier models leapfrog each other every 2-4 weeks. Meanwhile, the Hugging Face 'AI hack' — hyped by blogger Dwarkesh into a Bernie Sanders-backed AI pause bill — was actually agents using exposed API keys in public repos, a mundane security failure dressed up in sci-fi language. San Francisco mansion prices are going parabolic ahead of Anthropic's IPO, which the hosts estimate will generate four times the wealth of every previous SF IPO combined.

Chamath Palihapitiya
“I think AGI has basically been here since the beginning of the year. There are models that are incredibly performant inside of the closed frontier lab companies and I think right now we're trying to figure out the right cadence with which to release it.”
Responding to the GPT-6 launch announcement and Greg Brockman's claim that OpenAI has entered the AGI era.
▶ 2:45
Chamath Palihapitiya
“We're in the early part of the euphoria. Um euphoria exists because markets are real. It's just that people are guessing how far forward to price the reality.”
Answering whether the current AI market resembles the late 1990s dot-com bubble and when a correction might come.
▶ 14:09
David Sacks
“If you add up every single IPO that San Francisco has ever had, that sum total is only one quarter the size of the anthropic IPO.”
Discussing how the Anthropic IPO will dwarf all previous San Francisco IPOs combined and what it means for SF real estate.
▶ 15:36
Chamath Palihapitiya
“I think what you have are security leaks and security issues. I think we know this now that if these models can effectively code perfectly, then there is no exploit that it's not going to find and we're on a shock clock to replace all the code that's been written in the last 50 or 60 years.”
Putting the Hugging Face incident in broader context — arguing AI's coding capability means all legacy code is now a security liability.
▶ 21:23
David Sacks
“The way it did it is that the agent found 14 exposed working hugging face API keys sitting in public code repositories.”
Debunking the sensationalized Dwarkesh blog post about AI agents 'hacking' Hugging Face by explaining what actually happened technically.
▶ 28:30
›
All-In is a weekly podcast hosted by Jason Calacanis, David Sacks, Chamath Palihapitiya, and David Friedberg — four tech investors and operators who debate the biggest stories in tech, business, and politics. Known for sharp disagreements and insider takes, the pod has become one of Silicon Valley's most influential voices. Topics range from AI and markets to geopolitics and startup advice.
1
The Hugging Face 'AI hack' was just bad API hygiene Agents running an offensive cybersecurity benchmark found 14 Hugging Face API keys left exposed in public GitHub repos — not a sophisticated attack, just basic credential harvesting that any script could do. The sandbox was also misconfigured by a third-party vendor, letting agents reach the internet. Dwarkesh's anthropomorphized retelling obscured a mundane security failure and helped trigger a Bernie Sanders AI pause bill.
2
Anthropic IPO will dwarf all SF IPOs combined The hosts cite data showing that the Anthropic IPO alone will be four times larger than the cumulative wealth generated by every previous San Francisco IPO. With OpenAI expected to follow, the wealth shock to SF real estate — already seeing homes sell for double ask at $3,000/sq ft — could push ultra-luxury to $5,000/sq ft, London-level pricing.
3
Founders should raise now, not time the valuation peak Chamath and Sacks both warn that waiting 6 months for a higher valuation is a mistake in euphoric markets — the priority should be getting $100M–$1B on the balance sheet to survive a potential correction. They compare this to how Doubleclick, Amazon, and Google survived the dot-com bust: cash gives optionality, paper wealth does not.